...good old John McCain (emphasis on old).
...Barack Obama (emphasis on Barack Obama).
...Jesus (sorry Shane, but no).
...Ross Perot (ok, best possible option yet!)

Personally, and give me a big fat slap across the proverbial wrist, via your comments, if you wish, but I didn't vote for president.

That's right: VOTE NO ON PRESIDENT!

Why did I throw my vote away? Why didn't I do my civic duty to vote for whom I felt would best run our country, or at least for the party that I felt would best represent our country?

First, I don't believe I threw my vote away. Really, I think that no matter what a politician says he/she is going to do, not much will actually change, thus, I could have voted for the moon and we would still all be living in a democratic nation, sipping lattes, and gasping at the collapse of the world as we know it.

Second, I think that neither (not either) major candidate is best for our country, thus why I didn't vote (and I didn't do any research on the minor parties, so I didn't feel equipped to make an educated vote for one of the others...though I did consider the Green party ;) ). I truly believe that neither candidate has it right--but if I may pose a question: does any candidate ever have it right? and what exactly is "it"? What consititutes a "good" candidate? I can tell you this much: we will never have a consensus on this, meaning somebody always goes home to cry in their beer.

I am really just ready for this nonsense to be over with and for our country's government to leave the break-room and head back to actual issues: Uganda, poverty, balancing budgets, securing justice, freedom, etc.