A few years ago, I went to the Getty to see an exhibit of artwork from a monastery (which I believe was near Egypt?). Amongst other things, the exhibit contained many tapestries woven together with thousands of different colored threads that depicted religious scenes and such.
Now with paints, we all know that the artist can mix different pigments to obtain new colors. The same is partially true of threads, although they are not directly mixed (obviously). When I examined a tapestry up close, I realized that two different colored threads running next to each other produce the effect of a third color when viewed from a distance, simply because our eyes cannot focus on the tiny variations from a distance.
So, take a yellow thread, for instance. At times, it runs alongside a blue thread, a red thread, a black thread, another yellow thread. Depending on the thread it is combined with, the overall effect changes. The blue and yellow threads blend to create an effect of green, while up close the two colors cause each other to stand out in contrast. The red and yellow are more sympathetic with each other, and add warmth to the overall scene. When black and yellow meet, the yellow shines bright and is unmistakable, even from afar. And two yellow threads will bolster each other into a band of gold.
We are like this of course, every one of us. There are certain aspects of other people that only we can draw out, and aspects that are drawn out of us only by certain people. At times we clash, at times we sympathize, at times we shine bright, at times we join together in strength. It is necessary to understand the ways that everyone around us brings about these aspects, to understand just how important relationships are. We may be individual people, with our own unique job to play, but from a distance, in the grand scheme of things, we are all part of something greater: a big picture woven by a true artist.
And think of this: it is not just for visual appeal that the threads are arranged the way they are. It is also for structural integrity. Remove just one thread and not only does the picture fade, but the tapestry falls apart as well.
1 comments:
yes! well put. I especially enjoyed your final thought about the blend of structural integrity with aesthetics.
I find self-help courses, where you learn "the 7 best ways to be the best person ever," or "the top ten things to being one of the ten richest people" to be annoying and time-consuming at best. Certainly they have something important to say about human beings and what motivates us, but I just cannot believe that a 7-step program can ever be effective for everybody. Like you said, scott, we play such unique and differing roles in society. Its almost down-right silly to believe that all people will benefit from these things.
And that makes me wonder about church. When church is "done" a certain way, many believe that such is "the way." I think that its important to keep God wholly as the center of worship services, but probably not even that is done. And if it is, it is done through the lens of glorifying God by serving best his people. So what happens when a punk-ass skeptic like myself walks into the encounter and hates almost everything about it? I guess what I am trying to ask, or at least pose in the form of a rhetorical question, is how much of my uniqueness should be brought into play when pastors and leaders get together to discuss how "church" ought to be done?
should we consider the people in the church at all and so be "seeker-sensitive"; or should we copy the apostles and meet in humble surroundings and eat and share and laugh and worship together in light of God?
ahgg, i just don't know.
Post a Comment